Center for National Affairs (CNA), urged the Chief Justice to provide better and further particulars over the investigations against the EC officials.
The Chief Justice, Sophia Akuffo has been petitioned to expedite process into the alleged abuse of power and corruption scandal that have rocked the Electoral Commission.
The petitioners, Center for National Affairs (CNA), urged the Chief Justice to provide better and further particulars over the investigations against the EC officials.
Executive Director of the civil society group, Samuel Lartey said, the "petition before the CJ is not bigger than the election petition by any stretch of the imagination, it is not more serious or dire for our democracy than that gruesome legal battle yet nine months was enough to wrap it up."
READ MORE: Charlotte Osei and her deputies must step aside - Majority Leader
He said the 2013 petition against former President John Mahama was completed by the Supreme court in nine months adding that the latest petition should not delay.
"Why is it taking more than nine months to finish investigations against one state institutions?... Speed is not a virtue in justice delivery but a delay is also a vice," he added.
Background
A five-member committee was constituted to investigate the EC Chairperson Charlotte Osei together with her two deputies, Georgina Opoku Amankwah who is in charge of Corporate Service and Amadu Sulley, in charge of Operations as prescribed under Article 146 of the 1992 Constitution.
The committee presided over by a Supreme Court judge has two other Court of Appeal judges (male and female) as well as two other members nominated by the Council of State (male and female) as its membership.
READ ALSO: Workers petition Nana Addo to remove Charlotte Osei
The decision to form the committee follows the two separate petitions demanding the removal of the EC boss.
Some workers petitioned the President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo, asking for investigations into allegations of fraud and financial malfeasance against the Chair of the election management body.
They are also demanding her removal over allegations that she terminated a contract with STL and unilaterally renegotiated a contract with a vendor of the EC for $21,999,592 without informing her deputies or other commissioners.
READ ALSO: EC Deputy boss, others asked to proceed on leave over missing GH¢480,000
Charlotte Osei in response also accused her deputy Chairpersons of the Commission of arrogance and illegally signing contracts worth over GH¢40 million without her approval.
Here's the full petition:
A Petition to hasten the Investigation ongoing on the Commissioners of the Electoral Commission
Her Ladyship the Chief Justice,
Fully aware of the enormous responsibility associated with you office in supervising compliance to democratic tenets enshrined in our 1992 constitution,
Aware of the current novelty before Her Ladyship in determining the fate of commissioners at the Electoral Commissioner following a petition for their removal,
Being a civil society organisation with key interest in governance,
We at the Centre for National Affairs do hereby request your esteemed office to consider this petition as a barometer of public interest in seeing a closure to protracted leadership crisis at the Electoral Commission and urge your expedition.
A petition was received by the Presidency on the 19 day of July, 2017 from concerned staff of the Electoral Commission, requesting the Chairperson, Madam Charlotte Osei be impeached based on a number of accusations leveled against her. A concerned citizen, Emmanuel Korsi Senyo, also submitted two petitions dated 25 July, 2017 to the Presidency concerning the two Deputy Commissioners of The Electoral Commission
The President in following the provisions laid down in Article 146(3) of the 1992 Constitution, referred the petition to her Ladyship for the establishment of a prima faciecase. Her Ladyship established a prima facie case against the Electoral Commission Chairperson and Deputies and constituted a Committee to investigate the concerns stated out in the petitions in accordance with Article 146.
As we gradually approach a year after the process was initiated, we as concerned citizens are still yet to know the finality of the matter due to the prolonged periods of investigation and reporting of recommendations by the sitting Committee.
Considering the following:
-
A national referendum for the election of Metropolitan Municipal and District Chief Executives in 2019
-
A referendum for the creation of the new Regions in 2019 and
-
A National election for President and Members of Parliament in 2020;
which are issues of great national concern and critical indicators of our democratic progress. It remains important that the processes that are ongoing be expedited to bring finality to the matter. There is the need to also take into consideration the tendency for the prolonged nature of the matter to cause political tensions. It is a point worth noting that these proceedings if not duly expedited is capable of affecting our whole democratic set up.
We at Centre for National Affairs believe this delay is a result of the “exercise of discretionary powers” by the Chief Justice and the Commission set up to investigate the complaints. Where the Constitution under Article 146 provides the necessary procedure to handle petitions against Justices of a Superior Court, of which the Chairperson and her deputies fall under based on provisions in Article 44 Section 2 and 3, it fails to provide timelines for the completion of the various procedures. The timelines for these procedures are therefore wholly discretional in nature and wholly subject to the dictates of the authority in play.
Article 296(3) allows for judges to exercise discretionary powers without publishing a Constitutional Instrument or Statutory Instrument to govern the exercise of this power. However Article 159 empowers the Chief Justice, acting in accordance with advice of the Judicial Council and with the approval of the President, to enact Constitutional Instruments that provide regulations for the efficient performance of the functions of the Judicial Service and Council.
Using the above as basis, we call on Her Ladyship to expedite the process that is currently ongoing concerning the Electoral Commission Chairpersons and to also enact a Constitutional Instrument that would serve as regulations for any such enquiries that may be brought before the Chief Justice’s Office in the future.
All well-meaning citizens of our beloved country, Ghana, would be provided with some air of relief if the investigations are expedited and the recommendations forwarded to the President for the pronouncement on the matter to be made. This would go a long way in helping the Electoral Commission function effectively after several months of what has been observed as dysfunctional state of affairs at the election management body.